The post office is expected to become financially self-sufficient but only in the “longer term,” says the Department of Public Works. Canada Post lost more than a half billion last year: “As the business shifts from mail to parcels, pressure on costs continues.”
MPs yesterday questioned how an SS member escaped scrutiny prior to being honoured on Parliament Hill. Cabinet said it played no role in any background check on Yaroslav Hunka, 98, of North Bay, Ont.: “A Nazi was honoured in this place; I cannot believe I am even uttering these words.”
Speaker Anthony Rota yesterday was called an international embarrassment after presenting an SS member to the House of Commons as a “Canadian hero.” MPs expressed astonishment the member of the 14 Waffen Grenadier Division was given VIP treatment on Parliament Hill: “Members of Parliament feel betrayed right now.”
Subsidies will not save money-losing news media, says a Department of Heritage memo. A $595 million bailout fund approved by Parliament in 2019 is up for renewal next March 31: “Supports alone cannot redress the structural decline of the current business model.”
Canadians face the “terrible job” of choosing between higher taxes or fewer services due to mounting federal debt, former Bank of Canada governor David Dodge said yesterday. Testifying at the Commons finance committee, Dodge likened the financial outlook to the 1970s: “Governments cannot borrow their way out of these difficult choices.”
Enacting a GST holiday on new apartment construction is intended to benefit the middle class, Housing Minister Sean Fraser said yesterday. MPs took up Second Reading debate on the tax measure in Bill C-56 An Act To Amend The Excise Tax Act: “It is important that we advance measures that are going to increase the supply for middle class households.”
Members of the Commons environment committee say they must economize on travel to reduce their carbon footprint. One MP said the committee would not follow the lead of Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, his staff and officials who ran up more than $700,000 in travel expenses in the past year: “I am very concerned with the environmental footprint.”
CMHC in eight years confirmed construction of 12 new homes under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s plan to convert surplus Crown property into affordable housing, records show. The Department of Fisheries built one: “We are focused on building more houses.”
Most Canadians say they pay too much for what they get from governments and consider tax cheating commonplace. In-house research by the Canada Revenue Agency also found few think cheaters will ever get caught: “Rich people have an easier time tax cheating than middle class Canadians.”
Cabinet in a report to Parliament acknowledged it has not expropriated a penny in Russian assets in Canada despite 20 months of sanctions. The only property in Canadian custody, a Russian cargo plane, is still being ‘evaluated.’
Only one vessel in the navy’s costly submarine fleet has been to sea in years, records show. Maintenance and refit costs for submarines are more than $3 billion: “The government budgets approximately $325 million per year to conduct regular and cyclical maintenance.”
I open the cupboard,
reach for a mug.
My mind –
ahead of me –
sees coffee in it.
I hesitate.
In a moment of clarity
I return it to the shelf,
revoke its destiny,
choose another.
Because I can.
By Shai Ben-Shalom
Once upon a time officialdom discovered a new branch of science nobody had ever heard of. Fresh and exciting, it was quickly embraced by the smartest professors, the most progressive thinkers, the wisest judges. It swept the nation. You can’t argue with science.
Only later did Canadians learn it wasn’t science at all but a hodgepodge of supposition and anecdotes perpetuated by hidden agendas. Of course by then much harm was done. There were lawsuits and unsatisfying half-apologies but the people who foisted this fraud on the people were not known for their humility.
It was eugenics, the scientific claim that if dull people were prevented from having children by force if necessary, society as a whole would become sharper. Psychiatry And The Legacies Of Eugenics unravels this dark and startling story, the “devastating social movement of the first half of the twentieth century.”
The monstrosity of eugenics is well known. It formed a basis of Hitler’s Nuremberg Laws. Here authors go further in documenting the leading role played by Canadian scientists in claiming justification for coercive mutilation of humans.
Editor Dr. Erna Kurbegovic notes in Manitoba it was “pressure from the medical community” that prompted the legislature to introduce a 1933 Mental Deficiency Act. Only an outcry from Roman Catholics led MLAs to defeat the sterilization clause by a single vote, 21-20. “Eugenics was a powerful movement in the early twentieth century that captivated many medical professionals, social reformers and interest groups,” writes Kurbegovic.
Advocates included Emily Murphy, a suffragette whose statue today stands in front of the Senate, and Tommy Douglas, the New Democrat founder who wrote a 1933 Master’s thesis The Problems Of The Subnormal Family. Douglas lamented the burden to society of mental defectives, people with “moral standards below normal,” unwed mothers, alcoholics, prostitutes and those “so improvident as to be a public charge.”
Putting aside all sense of revulsion to the degree that’s possible, Professor Douglas Wahlsten of the University of Alberta in a devastating chapter points out the scientific claims of eugenics were gibberish. Intelligence is difficult to measure, and brains are not hereditary.
Wahlsten calculates even if Alberta fully enforced its 1928 Sexual Sterilization Act like a Nuremberg Law on all children who scored poorly on IQ tests, “every child below IQ 70 including those dearly loved, nurtured and sheltered by their parents,” the result would have been a temporary overall improvement of “about one third of an IQ point” in the entire province.
“An intelligence test is not a measure of some innate or biologically fixed entity,” writes Professor Wahlsten.
Professor Henderikus Stam of the University of Calgary, and psychologist Dr. Ashley Barlow of Edmonton, profile the most notorious Man Of Science in the eugenics crusade. He was John MacEachran, founder of the University of Alberta’s Department of Psychology.
MacEachran studied at the finest German universities. Wise and rational, he was chair of the Alberta Eugenics Board until his retirement at 88. “Like MacEachran himself, the Board was a model of bureaucratic efficiency,” write the authors. “With remarkably little oversight, and with the overt assistance of the medical profession, the Board operated out of the public eye.”
“We should endeavour to get away from a very costly form of sentiment and give more attention to raising and safeguarding the purity of the race,” MacEachran said in a 1932 speech. “We allow men and women of defective intelligence or those of these criminal tendencies to have children.”
Authors document a poignant letter to MacEachran from one woman sterilized by his order. She wanted children, she pleaded. Couldn’t the Doctor do something? “It was done for your own good,” replied MacEachran. “You would not want children who might have to come here and spend many years or perhaps their whole life in an institution.”
Psychiatry And The Legacies Of Eugenics is a shocking story, unbelievable if it were not true.
By Holly Doan
Psychiatry and the Legacies of Eugenics, edited by Frank W. Stahnisch and Erna Kurbegovic; Athabasca University Press; 412 pages; ISBN 9781-7719-92657; $37.99
The Commons public accounts committee yesterday by a unanimous 10-0 vote ordered the Auditor General to investigate the original taxpayers’ endowment used to bankroll the Trudeau Foundation. Parliament awarded the Foundation $125 million subsequently used in part to buy stocks in China: “We are asking for an investigation.”
One of the nation’s leading computer scientists says he refused a six-figure payoff from Chinese agents in what was an obvious “recruitment strategy” targeting Canadian academics. Professor Benjamin Fung of McGill University detailed the scheme in testimony at the Commons science committee: “I asked them, ‘What do you want me to do?”
