Blacklock's Reporter

They want to consult “at length”

where to sell pot

in Ontario.

Will delay store openings

by half a year.

But

issue is important,

deserves stakeholder input.

Citizen involvement and

public deliberation

key to moving forward.

They do not consult on small things:

dropping Cap-and-Trade Program,

scraping Basic Income Pilot Project,

cancelling renewable energy contracts,

axing fund for school repairs,

suspending plans for overdose prevention sites,

slashing Toronto City Council by half,

repealing sex-ed curriculum, and

telling brewers

what the price of beer should be.

Campaign slogan

says it all:

For The People

(Editor’s note: poet Shai Ben-Shalom, an Israeli-born biologist, examines current events in the Blacklock’s tradition each and every Sunday)

Fighting Words is a document of war, intriguing because so many of us know only peace. So, we learn the hanging of 1837 rebels was bungled so badly one prisoner was nearly decapitated; that rifles fired by Canadian troops in the Boer War sounded “like lightning humming birds” — Zzz-Zzz-Zzz-Zzz-Zzz; that Hitler on weekends wore a tweed coat one size too small.

These are anecdotes of Canadian war reporting from the age of Vikings to al-Qaeda. “People seem to have a pathological need for conflict,” writes Mark Bourrie. “They also have a very strong urge to tell stories about it.”

Bourrie recounts the most poignant reporting of anonymous diarists and acclaimed war correspondents like Stewart Lyon, who pioneered Canadian Press coverage of WWI; Ross Munro, who documented the slaughter at Dieppe in 1942; Gregory Clark, who filed on deadline from liberated Paris for the Toronto Star in 1944 though his own son was killed in action days before.

The result is compelling accounts of high-stakes conflict, human triumph and minutiae of depravity.

Here is Laura Secord, on stumbling through the woods in the dark to warn the Yanks were coming in 1812: “Here I found all the Indians encamped; by moonlight the scene was terrifying…Upon advancing to the Indians they all rose, and, with some yells, said ‘Woman,’ which made me tremble.”

Here is a Toronto Leader account of the death of a Fenian in 1866: “He was sensible and able to tell me that his names was James Gerrahty, from Cincinnati, and that one of his own comrades had shot him by mistake, and that he freely forgave him. He died in about thirteen minutes, one of his comrades holding a crucifix before him as long as he could see it. We buried him in an orchard.”

Here is Paul de Martigny, a Canadian reporter imprisoned by Nazis in occupied France: “Among the internees was a cultured Englishwoman with her 18-year-old idiot son. The guards delighted in torturing the mother by playing pranks on the boy. She spent most of the time in tears,” de Martigny recalled. “The more she wept, the more they teased.”

Tales of conflict are always the most indelible. In the words of one fighting man – not a Canadian – “It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we should grow too fond of it.”

By Holly Doan

Fighting Words: Canada’s Best War Reporting by Mark Bourrie; Dundurn; 368 pages; ISBN 978-1-45970-666-8; $29.99

Cabinet faces a $1 billion NAFTA claim for copyright theft by federal agencies. A Texas family-owned business yesterday served notice it will seek arbitration against the Government of Canada for breaching international copyright law.

“I think this is a wake-up call for American investors looking at Canada,” said Paul Einarsson, chair of Geophysical Service Inc. “Many Canadians have no idea this country is a piracy haven. Copyright creators have a big problem with Canada.”

The marine survey firm said it had to cut Calgary operations and lay off 250 employees after federal agencies copied and gave away its database, the largest collection of its kind in Canada. The Department of Foreign Affairs did not comment.

“No banana republic would do this,” said Einarsson. “Canada is the worst, but there is little awareness of it. This should be a front-page story. It’s plain property rights. How can the government just take away your property?”

Geophysical from 1969 to 2009 compiled offshore seismic maps for sale to oil and gas companies and deposited data with the National Energy Board and others as a condition of federal licensing. “The whole impetus for government licensing was for public safety and protection of the environment,” said Einarsson. “Then they decided to give away this copyright material. The whole thing is shocking.”

Einarsson said from 1999 using the Access To Information Act the company confirmed agencies sold or distributed its proprietary data without permission. Evidence submitted in 2014 to the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench showed in one case, millions’ worth of Beaufort Sea seismic maps were sold to third parties for $759 by the Canada-Newfoundland & Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board.

Company lawyers in a notice to cabinet said they will seek arbitration and damages for breach of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement. “When Canada signed NAFTA, the Canadian government committed to provide all American investors with core investment protections including that it would not require the transfer of proprietary knowledge to its persons from investors,” said the notice: “Canada has blatantly contravened international law, failed to live up to its commitments and should remedy that failure.”

Claim Unlawful Expropriation

Geophysical fought 25 separate court actions against the Energy Board, Department of Natural Resources, Offshore Petroleum Boards in Halifax and St. John’s and others. The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in 2016 ruled under an obscure provision of the 1953 Canada Petroleum Resources Act the firm’s copyright expired after five years, not 50 years from a creator’s death as detailed in the Copyright Act.

The Resources Act allows records to be “disclosed” but not “copied”, “republished” or “distributed”, company lawyers wrote cabinet. “When that Act was written in the 1950s the technology didn’t exist, and there was no ability to copy data,” said Einarsson. “Nobody knew those were the rules because the rules were not clear. That’s why we went to court. They never told us our copyright would be confiscated after five years. You had a level of bureaucrats running off and creating policy that was never intended in the legislation.”

The Supreme Court in 2017 declined to hear the company’s appeal. The 90-day NAFTA arbitration notice under Chapter 11 of the Trade Agreement accuses federal agencies of “shocking” breach of copyright, and expropriation of intellectual property.

“If the intent is to confiscate GSI’s seismic data through the Canada Petroleum Resources Act, that was a politically-driven decision for which Canada should compensate GSI for the fair market value of the seismic data it expropriated and the consequential losses of its business,” wrote the firm’s lawyers Borden Ladner Gervais LLP of Calgary.

By Staff