The Commons has passed a bill to ban media and animal rights activists from photographing the annual Atlantic seal hunt. Bill C-555 permits RCMP to arrest anyone but sealers or government-licensed “observers” within 1.6 kilometres of the hunt: ‘It will not change a thing’.
Parliament is running short on time to ratify a signature trade pact with the European Union before the next election, says the Conservative chair of the Commons agriculture committee. Cabinet has given no indication when a ratification bill will be introduced: “The days are short”.
A group of 124 scientists and conservationists, including six retired federal researchers, are petitioning cabinet to withdraw proposed aquaculture amendments to the Fisheries Act. Petitioners say they are “gravely concerned” with permitted use of pesticides and other chemicals in fish habitat: “Why?”
Suicide is not a workplace death even if prompted by symptoms caused by an on-the-job accident, the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench has ruled. The judgment came in the case of a Canadian National Railway Co. signalman driven to hang himself after suffering with tinnitus: “This is not uncommon. It happens. It’s horrible”.
A Québec firm is claiming anti-college bias over the loss of a million-dollar federal accounting contract. The Gatineau consulting company says it lost a Public Works bid after staff rejected the college credentials of an employee: ‘This is discriminatory’.
Cabinet appears in breach of federal law over its refusal to divulge costs of a government program, says the Parliamentary Budget Office. The finding follows the defence department’s refusal to itemize costs of the latest overseas mission: “I’m calling it secrecy and deception”.
The Department of Labour claims Canadian hospitals faced having to turn off the heat due to a 24-hour strike by Canadian Pacific Rail engineers. Labour Minister Kellie Leitch made the claim in the House of Commons. No industry executives confirmed a fuel shortage. Leitch made similar unsubstantiated claims of dire consequences over a 2011 Canada Post strike: “I have received letters”.
Exposure to traffic pollution may be linked to breast cancer, according to new Health Canada research. A study of illness in 19 Canadian cities over a 20-year period suggests the risk of breast cancer increases in women who live near roads and highways: “It is a valuable finding”.
The Government of Canada has become a “non-player” in animal welfare research despite public concern over treatment of farm animals, says a member of a national advisory panel: ‘They couldn’t have made it more difficult for scientists if they tried’.
A federal report warns industry proposals to ship oil from British Columbia fail to address critical issues affecting whale populations. The Department of Fisheries analysis expressed concern with claims by Kinder Morgan Canada over the impact of oil tanker traffic off the B.C. coast.
“There are deficiencies in both the assessment of potential effects resulting from ship strikes and exposure to underwater noise,” wrote a department secretariat; “Ship strike is a threat of conservation concern, particularly for baleen whales.”
Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion proposes to pipe oil 1,150-kilometres from Strathcona County, Alta. to Burnaby, B.C. for loading aboard tankers. Cabinet in 2014 amended the classification of Pacific humpback whales under its Species At Risk Act to permit unrestricted tanker traffic.
West Coast tanker traffic is projected to increase from some 600 shipments a year to 2,400 with increased oil exports, according to the Commissioner of the Environment. “It’s a big issue,” said MP Nathan Cullen.
“It’s a global concern, particularly in an area where we have had recovery of whale species,” said Cullen, MP for Skeena-Bulkley Valley, B.C.; “The process that is being used by the government so far is flawed, and the public has lost faith. It doesn’t provide certainty and creates avenues for conflict.” Cullen has sponsored Bill C-628 An Act To Amend The Canada Shipping Act to ban international oil tankers off the B.C. coast.
The fisheries analysis of Kinder Morgan’s proposal now before the National Energy Board cited “insufficient information and analysis” regarding the threat to whales, and concluded the company used unreliable data in calculating odds of ship strikes.
Cabinet in an order last April 19 downgraded the Pacific humpback whale from “threatened” status under the Species At Risk Act to a lesser rating of “species of concern”. In a notice, Environment Canada acknowledged even routine shipping posed a “variety of threats, notably vessel strikes, entanglements in fishing gear, and disturbance or displacement due to underwater noise.”
Ecology groups earlier sued the Department of the Environment for failing to finalize a recovery strategy for the whales after they were identified as a threatened species in 2005. Pacific humpback whales were hunted commercially till 1966. The population has since recovered from a few hundred to some 18,000.
The whale analysis followed a report by the Council of Canadians cautioning of major ecological damage from a bitumen spill in the St. Lawrence River. A tanker or pipeline breach would result in some $1.4 billion in damage, the council estimated.
“We can certainly use the model anywhere that oil is being transported,” said the Council’s Mark Calzavara. “It can apply equally to pipeline spills and spills from vessels.”
By Kaven Baker-Voakes 
The National Energy Board is commissioning a $50,000 “risk assessment” of claims by TransCanada Corp. in its application for the Energy East project. The bid follows in-house research by the Department of Natural Resources that only a third of Canadians surveyed are confident in the government’s ability to handle an oil spill: “That is not a vote of confidence”.
Canada has made a growth industry in shipping hazardous material out of the country, nearly doubling exports in a decade, according to official figures. Shipments of recyclable toxic waste increased by more than 200,000 tonnes since 2005: ‘Is there is room to improve?’
Cabinet must “think again” when attempting to recruit Canada’s 27,000 law firms as federal agents in combating money-laundering, attorneys say. The Government of Canada had no comment after the Supreme Court struck down a 2001 law allowing federal agents to scrutinize lawyers’ client lists in the hunt for suspected criminals: ‘Lawyers are not agents for the state’.
Three months after promising speedy disclosure of proposed cuts to Crown employees’ pension benefits, cabinet is quiet on plans to repeal guaranteed benefits. “We’ll just wait,” said Kevin Sorenson, Minister of State for Finance: “I can tell you one thing…”
The Supreme Court today struck down yet another Act of Parliament, a 2001 bill compelling lawyers to submit clients’ identities in the name of anti-terrorism. Justices ruled unanimously that cabinet went too far in treating attorneys as agents of the Government of Canada.
“The regime authorizes sweeping law office searches which inherently risk breaching solicitor-client privilege,” wrote Justice Thomas Cromwell for the Court. “It does so in a criminal law setting and for criminal law purposes.”
Under the Proceeds Of Crime & Terrorist Financing Act all lawyers were required to keep records of clients’ ID and submit to federal audits under threat of $500,000 fines. The law also attempted to track cash transactions of $10,000 or more by banks, realtors, casinos, currency exchange firms, diamond dealers and others.
The Federation of Law Societies spent over a decade fighting the law as unconstitutional. Supreme Court justices agreed the Act was illegal. “There is overwhelming evidence of a strong and widespread consensus concerning the fundamental importance in democratic states of protection against state interference with the lawyer’s commitment to his or her client’s cause,” Justice Cromwell wrote.
The Department of Justice spent more than $3 million defending the Act, according to accounts obtained by Blacklock’s. Canada has some 27,000 law firms.
The Act, which predated 9/11 anti-terror regulations, prompted the Federation of Law Societies to publish its own “know your client” guidelines that restricted lawyers from accepting large cash payments, and other measures. “The disappointment is we had in the law societies really stepped up to the plate,” John Hunter, past federation president, said in an earlier interview.
“The government did not have to go to litigation,” Hunter said. “We thought we were working to similar ends.” The British Columbia Supreme Court ruled in 2012 the federal regulations were unconstitutional, and treated lawyers as information gatherers for federal agents.
Lawyers remain at “real risk for money laundering”, according to a confidential government report obtained through Access To Information January 30. The study by the Financial Transactions & Reports Analysis Centre complained that Canadian attorneys “are sought after by those desiring to launder funds” specifically because of client-solicitor privilege.
“International sector exports and investigators shared that they were aware of a number of cases wherein legal services had been used, including the use of a trust account, to assist money laundering operations,” said the report Money Laundering & Terrorist Financing Vulnerability Assessments, authored by Grant Thornton LLP for the federal government.
By Dale Smith
