Tax filers face $50 a day fines and mandatory oaths under threat of perjury for failing to cooperate with the Canada Revenue Agency. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne outlined the proposals Friday in draft amendments to the Income Tax Act: “These proposed amendments are intended to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of tax audits.”
Department of Immigration employees are invited to workday festivities marking “public service pride week” at an undisclosed cost, according to an internal staff notice. Events include a workday bingo game Thursday with a “sexy drag rock star.”
Climate change is causing “ecological grief” in First Nations, says a federal report. The Department of Indigenous Services said more funds are required for climate counseling under a “wellness program” already budgeted at nearly $1.6 billion: ‘Wildfires can create ecological grief.’
Public Works Minister Joel Lightbound will not comment on his department’s attempt to fast-track a review of proposed Canada Post service cuts. The department in the past has discussed elimination of daily mail delivery at a saving of more than $70 million a year: “Most Canadians are willing to accept changes in the delivery of mail once they were made aware of some of Canada Post’s financial challenges.”
Neither drowning nor
Staying afloat.
The polls
Indicate
What the
Elect need.
It’s a form of
Mob rule.
But at the edge,
Families
Recede
And make due.
A breaking point,
Or a shift in the plan?
A man can breathe on the prairies.
By W.N. Branson 
If the government can’t run a passport office, it can’t regulate the subtleties of parenting. Still they try. For twenty years advocates have sought repeal of section 43 of the Criminal Code that sanctions “reasonable” spanking to correct youngsters’ behaviour. It was written in 1892 by a Catholic justice minister with nine children, and survived numerous court challenges and parliamentary hearings.
Québec author Marie-Aimée Cliche examines the practice: “Once it was accepted that the aim of parenting was to bring children up in the way they should, without spoiling or terrorizing them, what was the appropriate method to achieve this objective?”
Abuse or Punishment? is a lively investigation of spanking rooted in Biblical law and family culture. Cliche examines corporal punishment in Old Québec dating from the 19th century, but the research would interest any parent anywhere. This, from the first-ever Canadian parenting guide published in 1851: “Have you ever seen the little boy who can never be satisfied, who asks for bread and jam but throws it on the floor after a single bite?”
“This little one will drown his parents with sadness if they are unable to correct his bad behaviour,” concluded the guide. “One should strike children only rarely, when other means of correction have proven ineffective.”
The modern debate dates from 1994 when police in London, Ont. charged a father with assaulting his five-year-old daughter in a parking lot. It had been a long hot day. The Peterson family was on a road trip from Warrenton, Ill. Little Rachel Peterson pushed her two-year old brother out of the car then slammed the door on his fingers. Father David Peterson spanked her six times when a passerby called police. Mr. Peterson was arrested, fingerprinted, strip-searched and spent the night in a London jail.
Peterson was acquitted at trial under section 43. The judge found him a “responsible, reasonable and caring parent.” The verdict prompted a Regina social worker to challenge the Criminal Code sanction, unsuccessfully. Justices ruled in 1994 that ordinary spanking was not, in fact, child abuse.
The judgment upheld conventional wisdom, Cliche notes. In 1864 Québec judges concluded spanking of six-year-olds was permitted so long as punishment did not involve “arbitrariness, whim, anger or ill-humour” and was proportionate to the “nature of the offence.” Then and now, Rachel Peterson probably had it coming.
Abuse or Punishment? is fresh and beautifully researched. If use of physical force in parenting is technically legal, Cliche observes it has always provoked unease. She cites Canadians’ reaction to the Gagnon Trial of 1920, the most notorious case of child abuse of the era, when a Québec farm couple were convicted in the torture killing of a stepdaughter who was daily beaten, burned with a fireplace poker, tied to a table leg and forced to eat excrement and cleaning powder.
Cliche notes that long afterward, “Madame Gagnon” was an everyday reference for parental abuse. The case inspired four novels, a 1951 film and a popular Québec stage play so powerful the actress who played the abusive stepmother was personally accosted after performances.
Then and now, parenting is an inexact science by fallible humans who mainly do their best. Abuse recounts a 1945 guide from Courrier de Radio Parents that remains as valid as the day it was published: “Draw the child’s attention to what is being asked,” the guide advised; “Only ask of what is strictly necessary, what is important, and forget the rest.”
“Warn them 10 or 15 minutes in advance that you are going to ask them to do something,” said the guide. “Think hard before giving an order, give it in clear, precise manner, display firmness, do not make conditions or concessions” and “resort to authority or force only when children have deliberately and knowingly refused to obey.”
By Holly Doan
Abuse Or Punishment? Violence toward Children in Quebec Families, 1850-1969; by Marie-Aimée Cliche; translated by W. Donald Wilson; Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 408 pages; ISBN 9781-7711-20630; $36.74
The Privy Council yesterday would not comment on recommendations of two parliamentary committees that it renew Yves Giroux’s term as $255,000-a year Budget Officer. Giroux, a frequent critic of the Liberal cabinet, is out of office September 2: “I work for the benefit of taxpayers and Canadians. I don’t have a vested interest.”
A federal agency secretly changed its rules on historical designations rather than honour Brian Mulroney as a “national historic person,” according to Access To Information records. Members of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board “held a lively debate” four months after Mulroney’s death on whether to grant him the same tribute given his predecessors: “Once time has passed it will be possible to better understand his impact.”
Parliament must “look at ways we can penalize the regime in Beijing” over tariffs on 40,000 canola farmers, Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre said yesterday. He proposed immediate cancellation of $1.1 billion in federally-financed contracts with Chinese shipyards: “That is crazy, at a time when they are targeting our farmers.”
Federal agencies are concealing names of Nazi collaborators let into postwar Canada for fear that disclosure “might cause them harm,” a B’nai Brith Canada executive said last evening. The advocacy group has asked a federal judge to quash secrecy orders on decades-old files: “I think we have to balance whether or not you can harm a former Nazi.”
Millions of Canadians still carry cash in their wallet and keep banknotes at home, Bank of Canada researchers said yesterday. The latest study followed new restrictions on cash by retail banks: “Cash holdings have increased.”
Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne yesterday doubled down in a tariff war with China only hours after the People’s Republic announced punishing surcharges on Canadian canola. It was a question of “Canadian values,” said the finance department.
Only the private sector can solve Canada’s housing crisis, CMHC said yesterday in a report. It followed Prime Minister Mark Carney’s promise to revive a 1974 tax shelter for builders: “Governments do not have the resources to meet overwhelming demand.”
Hundreds of thousands of people who took out Liberal memberships during the Party’s March 9 leadership race were never counted as casting ballots, according to new figures released yesterday by Liberal headquarters. The Party did not explain the large discrepancy: “We have to be very realistic to the threats of foreign interference.”
Deportation of foreign criminals would be made easier under a Conservative bill to be introduced in the Commons, Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill) yesterday told reporters. “Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right,” said Rempel Garner, vice-chair of the Commons immigration committee.
