Odd Hearing Sees Complaint

A federal adjudicator is accused of bias after laughing and joking with a complainant’s lawyer, and accepting a novelty gift she called “almost pornographic”. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal member declined to withdraw from the case: “Colourlessness or absolute neutrality is not required in order to be impartial.”

This content is for Blacklock’s Reporter members only. Please login to view this content. (Register here.)

Back to Top